Spatial Planning and Urban Development: Critical Perspectives

كوكب الجغرافيا مارس 12, 2020 مارس 12, 2020
للقراءة
كلمة
0 تعليق
-A A +A

Spatial Planning and Urban Development
Critical Perspectives



Pier Carlo Palermo - Davide Ponzini


Springer

2010



Professor Pier Carlo Palermo

Politecnico di Milano

Dipartimento di Architettura e

Pianificazione

Via Bonardi, 3

20133 Milano

Italy

piercarlo.palermo@polimi.it



Dr. Davide Ponzini

Politecnico di Milano

Dipartimento di Architettura e

Pianificazione

Via Bonardi, 3

20133 Milano

Italy

davide.ponzini@polimi.it


Contents

Part I Urban Development and Planning: Issues and Dilemmas

1 The Topic of Study ........................... 3

2 The Many Faces of Planning ...................... 7

3 A Crossroads with Many Dimensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

4 Emerging Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

5 The Course of Our Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

Part II Unfinished Projects for Disciplinary Foundation

6 The Rise and Crisis of Planning Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

7 Urban Design: The Lost Object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

8 Decision-Centred Views . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

9 The Social Rootedness of Urban Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

10 The Interactive Turn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

11 The Collaborative Shift . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

12 Escaping into Irrationality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91

13 Designing the Possible . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99

Part III Mediterranean Planning Cultures: Italy

14 Characteristics of the Italian Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111

15 Towards a Planning Science? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

16 City Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125

17 Reformist Mainstream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135

18 The Challenges for Policy Making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143

19 Reconsidering Policy Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153

Part IV Critical Issues and Perspectives

20 Planning, Implementation and Policy Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163

21 Urban Regulation: Critical Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175

22 Sense and Limits of Spatial Visioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181

23 Urban Development Projects in a Strategic Framework . . . . . . 189

Part V Rethinking Spatial Planning and Urban Development

24 Choosing the Paradigm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201

25 The Quality in Spatial Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207

References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213

Name Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241

Subject Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245


    Urban planning is a complex field of knowledge and practice. Through the decades, theoretical debate has formed an eclectic set of possible perspectives, without finding, in our opinion, a coherent paradigmatic framework which can adequately guide the interpretation and action in urban planning. The hypothesis of this book is that the attempts of founding an autonomous planning theory are inadequate if they do not explore two interconnected fields: architecture and public policies.The book critically reviews a selected set of current practices and theoretical founding works of modern and contemporary urban planning by highlighting the continuous search for the epistemic legitimization of a large variety of experiences. The distinctive contribution of this book is a documented critique to the eclecticism and abstraction of the main international trends in current planning theory. The dialogic relationship with the traditions of architecture and public policy is proposed here in order to critically review planning theory and practice. The outcome is the proposal of a paradigmatic framework that, in the authors’ opinion, can adequately guide reflections and actions. A pragmatic and interpretative heritage and the project-orientated approach are the basis of this new spatial planning paradigm.


Download

↳      mediafire

↳          top4top

شارك المقال لتنفع به غيرك

إرسال تعليق

0 تعليقات

3832018391793669111
https://www.merefa2000.com/